AL-1042: Add a distinct corrector for Roman

[mcara]

Add a roman-specific corrector class with unique romantics string.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.51%. Comparing base (b3a32ea) to head (f58bb46).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #243      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.53%   93.51%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        2011     2021      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         1881     1890       +9     
- Misses        130      131       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[braingram]

LGTM. 2 minor comments that don't need to hold up approval.

[PaulHuwe]

LGTM. Thanks!

[mcara]

I actually do wonder if it would be better to move the new class to romancal - it actually seems the most logical place.

[mairanteodoro]

I actually do wonder if it would be better to move the new class to romancal - it actually seems the most logical place.

If the new class is supposed to have the same purpose and functionality as that for JWST, I don't think it should be moved to romancal.

[braingram]

Thanks for making the updates. Code LGTM. Would you run and link regression tests for jwst and roman that use this PR?

[PaulHuwe]

LGTM

[mcara]

Regression tests:

• romancal: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/23469495331
• jwst: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/23469486079

[mcara]

Thanks for making the updates. Code LGTM. Would you run and link regression tests for jwst and roman that use this PR?

Done

[mcara]

Re-running regression tests for pipelines using this branch as dependency. It does not test that new correcto for romancal works in the pipeline (those tests will be run in pipeline PRs). It just shows that merging this PR will not affect pipelines:

• romancal: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/25387931551
• JWST: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/25387955661

[mcara]

Regression tests pass but CI style check is failing with numerous warnings in unrelated files possibly caused by #247. Should I revert that PR?