Add five more cases of superfluous actions and recommend their replacements

[agriyakhetarpal]

Pre-submission checks

Please check these boxes:

• Mandatory: This PR corresponds to an issue (if not, please create
  one first).

• Having read the AI policy, I hereby disclose the use of an LLM or other
  AI coding assistant in the creation of this PR. PRs will not be rejected
  for using AI tools, but will be rejected for undisclosed use or
  use that violates the policy.

If a checkbox is not applicable, you can leave it unchecked.

Summary

In continuation of my previous contribution via #1873, I discovered that some actions across the projects I am involved in are superfluous and can be replaced with simpler commands. This PR adds them to the list. All of these have more than a hundred uses at this time, as noted in the table below.

Action	Why?	Usage metrics
actions-ecosystem/action-add-labels	Can be replaced with gh issue or gh pr commands	Search results (3.6K hits)
actions-ecosystem/action-remove-labels	Can be replaced with gh issue or gh pr commands	Search results (2.3K hits)
sergeysova/jq-action	It's literally just jq! It's installed by default on GHA Linux runners. However, jq needs to be installed on macOS runners (via Homebrew or other package managers), from the last time I remember trying it.	Search results (636 hits, and this is pretty surprising to me! 🙈)
stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action	Commonly used to add files and commit them to a PR or a branch. I've noted this with a pedantic persona and a low-confidence score: there are some features, such as the dirty check (git status --porcelain plus an early exit), committer identity config, and push setup, etc., that require enough boilerplate to justify their existence.	Search results (44.5K hits)
EndBug/add-and-commit	Same use case as stefanzweifel. It also exposes outputs like commit_long_sha and pushed, which downstream steps may consume — those need git rev-parse HEAD, and so on to replicate. Again, I believe this is all doable with git, but feel that there are enough moving parts for Pedantic/Low.	Search results (21.6K hits)

Thank you :D

[woodruffw]

Thanks @agriyakhetarpal! These persona/confidence levels seem reasonable to me on first blush.