docs: add MPP vs x402 comparison page#624
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1393adceb0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| MPP and x402 both use HTTP `402 Payment Required` to charge for API requests. They solve the same core problem, but they operate at different levels of scope. | ||
|
|
||
| x402 is more crypto-focused. MPP uses the same `402` pattern, but broadens it to support stablecoins, cards, Lightning, and session-based billing for high-frequency usage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace banned “crypto” wording with stablecoin terminology
This page repeatedly uses crypto phrasing (crypto-focused, crypto payments), which conflicts with the repository doc standard in /workspace/mpp/AGENTS.md (“Avoid ... The word crypto—use stablecoins instead”). Leaving this as-is creates inconsistent terminology across docs and contradicts the project’s required language for payment methods.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is ok here
| @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| description: "Compare MPP vs x402 for HTTP 402 payments. Learn the protocol differences, supported payment methods, session support, and when to choose each approach." | |||
| imageDescription: "MPP vs x402 comparison" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rewrite OG imageDescription with outcome-focused copy
The imageDescription value repeats the page title rather than adding a marketing benefit, which violates /workspace/mpp/AGENTS.md OG-card guidance (“Don’t restate the page title—add context the title doesn’t provide”). This weakens social preview quality and makes the card text less useful in link unfurls.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Add a standalone MPP vs x402 comparison page and link to it from the FAQ without adding it to the sidebar.