AI governance | release readiness | enterprise AI operating models | multi-agent systems | process excellence
I build open-source repositories around trustworthy, auditable AI for regulated and high-accountability environments.
If you want to know where to begin, use this guide:
| Goal | Start with | Maturity |
|---|---|---|
| Understand the full operating model for enterprise AI | governance-playbook |
Practitioner playbook |
| Validate AI release readiness with a working CLI | release-checklist |
Alpha working tool |
| Understand release-stage governance | release-governance |
Framework |
| Apply NIST AI RMF in practice | nist-rmf-guide |
Practitioner guide |
| Start a new regulated-AI repo from a template | regulated-ai |
Template repo |
| Explore multi-agent governance and control patterns | multi-agent-governance |
Framework |
| See runnable multi-agent behavior in code | agent-simulator |
Runnable demo |
| Use AI for structured process-improvement work | lean-ai-ops |
Working app |
| Browse curated governance resources | ai-prism |
Resource hub |
My Medium articles describe the operating problems. These repositories translate those ideas into reusable artifacts, templates, and tools.
| Medium theme | Use this repository | Practical next step |
|---|---|---|
| Why AI governance fails in safety-critical or regulated systems | governance-playbook |
Adapt the operating-model template |
| AI release readiness as the missing operational layer | release-checklist |
Run the sample YAML validator |
| Release gates as accountability and readiness controls | release-governance |
Compare the lifecycle gates with the CLI checks |
| Human-in-the-loop is not enough without ownership and redress | accountability-patterns |
Fill the accountability matrix |
| AI roadmaps should be governed by risk, value, and execution reality | governance-playbook |
Use the intake and prioritization artifacts |
| EU AI Act and regulated-AI readiness | nist-rmf-guide, regulated-ai, ai-prism |
Start with a gap assessment and template kit |
| Multi-agent systems need control logic, evaluation, and escalation paths | multi-agent-governance, agent-eval, agent-simulator |
Review the evaluation framework, then run the simulator |
| Repository | Type | What it does |
|---|---|---|
release-checklist |
CLI | Validates YAML-based release-readiness configurations |
agent-simulator |
Runnable demo | Simulates bounded multi-agent workflows |
lean-ai-ops |
Streamlit app | Generates DMAIC-style improvement packages with analytics |
| Repository | Type | What it does |
|---|---|---|
governance-playbook |
Playbook | End-to-end AI operating model |
release-governance |
Framework | Release lifecycle governance and gates |
nist-rmf-guide |
Guide | Practitioner implementation guide for NIST AI RMF |
accountability-patterns |
Pattern catalog | Accountability, oversight, and redress patterns |
multi-agent-governance |
Framework | Trust, oversight, and accountability for multi-agent systems |
agent-orchestration |
Pattern catalog | Routing, delegation, validation, and failure-handling patterns |
agent-eval |
Evaluation framework | Agent evaluation dimensions, scenarios, and reporting structure |
| Repository | Type | What it does |
|---|---|---|
regulated-ai |
Template repo | Governance docs, release stubs, and starter workflows |
ai-prism |
Reference hub | Curated governance frameworks, tools, standards, and papers |
flowchart TD
GOV["governance-playbook"]
NIST["nist-rmf-guide"]
RELGOV["release-governance"]
RELCHK["release-checklist"]
STARTER["regulated-ai"]
ACC["accountability-patterns"]
MAGOV["multi-agent-governance"]
ORCH["agent-orchestration"]
EVAL["agent-eval"]
SIM["agent-simulator"]
LSS["lean-ai-ops"]
PRISM["ai-prism"]
GOV --> RELGOV
GOV --> NIST
GOV --> ACC
RELGOV --> RELCHK
NIST --> STARTER
ACC --> MAGOV
MAGOV --> ORCH
MAGOV --> EVAL
EVAL --> SIM
SIM --> LSS
PRISM -.-> GOV
PRISM -.-> NIST
- clear artifact types so tools, frameworks, templates, and references are not confused
- truthful maturity labels so prototypes are not presented as finished products
- practical usefulness over theory for its own sake
- traceability and accountability wherever decisions, gates, or evaluations are involved
- evidence discipline so claims, assumptions, and gaps are separated clearly
These repositories are practitioner resources shared in a personal capacity. They are not legal advice, compliance certification, regulatory approval, safety certification, or official guidance from NIST, the EU, ISO, or any employer.
References to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and related standards are self-assessed, practitioner mappings. Always verify against official sources before using them for compliance, safety, or release decisions.
git clone https://github.com/simaba/release-checklist.git
cd release-checklist
python -m pip install -e .
release-checklist init --industry healthcare
release-checklist validate configs/medium-risk-example.yaml
release-checklist report configs/medium-risk-example.yaml --format markdownMost repositories are MIT licensed. ai-prism is released under CC0.
