Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 20 minutes and 20 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR introduces a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@lambdapdk/asap7/libs/fakeram7.py`:
- Around line 454-455: The continuation indentation for the super().__init__
call is triggering flake8 E128; adjust the call so the second argument is
aligned with the first or indented under the opening parenthesis. For example,
format the invocation of super().__init__("la_spregfile",
FakeRAM7Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs) so the
FakeRAM7Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs argument is on the same line or properly
indented beneath the opening parenthesis to satisfy flake8; update the
super().__init__ invocation in the class that references "la_spregfile" and
FakeRAM7Lambdalib_SinglePort accordingly.
In `@lambdapdk/freepdk45/libs/fakeram45.py`:
- Around line 154-155: The call to super().__init__ in fakeram45.py currently
has a hanging-indent style that triggers E128; adjust the indentation of the
continuation line so it visually lines up with the opening parenthesis or the
first argument. Specifically, in the call to super().__init__("la_spregfile",
FakeRAM45Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs) ensure the second line is indented to
match the position after the opening paren (or align with the first argument) so
the continuation is visually consistent and E128 is resolved.
In `@lambdapdk/gf180/libs/gf180sram.py`:
- Around line 193-194: The constructor call to super().__init__ in the class
containing "la_spregfile" is mis-indented causing E128; fix the indentation so
the second line aligns with the opening parenthesis (or indent one additional
level) for the arguments, e.g. ensure GF180Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs is
vertically aligned with "la_spregfile" within the super().__init( ... ) call;
update the super().__init__("la_spregfile",
GF180Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs) invocation accordingly to conform to E128
rules.
In `@lambdapdk/ihp130/libs/sg13g2_sram.py`:
- Around line 177-178: The continuation of the super().__init__ call is
misaligned causing flake8 E128; reformat the call to use a proper visual
continuation by placing the opening parenthesis on the first line and aligning
subsequent arguments under it (i.e., break the arguments onto their own indented
lines) for the call to super().__init__ that passes "la_spregfile" and
IHP130Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs so the indentation conforms to E128.
In `@lambdapdk/sky130/libs/sky130sram.py`:
- Around line 139-143: The code sets lib_path to Path("lambdapdk", "ihp130",
"libs", "sg13g2_sram") but then registers la_spregfile.v from that IHP130 path,
causing the wrong PDK to be packaged; update lib_path to the correct Sky130 PDK
directory (e.g., Path("lambdapdk", "sky130", "libs", "<appropriate_sram_dir>")
or the actual sky130 regfile path) so that the call self.add_file(lib_path /
"lambda" / "la_spregfile.v") references the Sky130 RTL; adjust the Path
construction where lib_path is defined (and keep surrounding
active_dataroot("lambdapdk") / active_fileset("rtl") / add_file usage intact).
- Around line 132-133: The continuation indentation on the super().__init__ call
for "la_spregfile" is violating flake8 E128; fix it by reformatting the
constructor call so the argument lines use a valid continuation indent (either
place both arguments on one line or put the second argument on the next line
with a hanging indent aligned under the first argument or the opening
parenthesis). Update the super().__init__ invocation that passes "la_spregfile"
and Sky130Lambdalib_SinglePort().techlibs to follow standard continuation-indent
rules so flake8 no longer errors.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 28595914-7c03-4edb-9f6e-033427759e98
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
lambdapdk/__init__.pylambdapdk/asap7/libs/fakeram7.pylambdapdk/asap7/libs/fakeram7/lambda/la_spregfile.vlambdapdk/freepdk45/libs/fakeram45.pylambdapdk/freepdk45/libs/fakeram45/lambda/la_spregfile.vlambdapdk/gf180/libs/gf180mcu_fd_ip_sram/lambda/la_spregfile.vlambdapdk/gf180/libs/gf180sram.pylambdapdk/ihp130/libs/sg13g2_sram.pylambdapdk/ihp130/libs/sg13g2_sram/lambda/la_spregfile.vlambdapdk/sky130/libs/sky130sram.pylambdapdk/sky130/libs/sky130sram/lambda/la_spregfile.vtests/test_lambda.py
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/test_lambda.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests