Skip to content

chore: sync from monorepo @35cafa4#40

Open
WomB0ComB0 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sync/monorepo-35cafa4
Open

chore: sync from monorepo @35cafa4#40
WomB0ComB0 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sync/monorepo-35cafa4

Conversation

@WomB0ComB0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Automated sync from resq-software/resQ@35cafa4.

Review before merging — direct pushes to standalone repos are preserved.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@WomB0ComB0 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 59 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9febd2fd-01d5-4c8e-84c7-57ee8d6fe1e2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b255bb4 and 4722e83.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Directory.Packages.props
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sync/monorepo-35cafa4

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 59 minutes and 55 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates several dependency versions in Directory.Packages.props, including Grpc.Net.Client, various Microsoft.Extensions packages, and System.Text.Json. A review comment identifies a version inconsistency, suggesting that System.Text.Json should be upgraded to version 10.0.7 to match the Microsoft.Extensions packages and avoid potential runtime errors or dependency conflicts.

Comment thread Directory.Packages.props
<PackageVersion Include="Polly" Version="8.6.6" />
<PackageVersion Include="Polly.Extensions.Http" Version="3.0.0" />
<PackageVersion Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.14" />
<PackageVersion Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.15" />
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The version of System.Text.Json (9.0.15) is inconsistent with the Microsoft.Extensions.* packages (10.0.7). In the .NET ecosystem, these core libraries are typically released as a synchronized set to ensure compatibility. Using a lower major version for System.Text.Json while using a higher major version for Microsoft.Extensions can lead to dependency conflicts or runtime errors (such as MissingMethodException), as the v10 extensions likely depend on features or signatures introduced in the v10 JSON library. Consider aligning System.Text.Json to version 10.0.7 to maintain consistency across the dependency graph.

    <PackageVersion Include="System.Text.Json" Version="10.0.7" />

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant