Skip to content

chore(azure): enhance metadata for network service#9624

Merged
danibarranqueroo merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
review_metadata_azure_network
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

chore(azure): enhance metadata for network service#9624
danibarranqueroo merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
review_metadata_azure_network

Conversation

@puchy22
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@puchy22 puchy22 commented Dec 22, 2025

Context

Updating azure network service metadata to conform with the new standardized metadata format used across Prowler checks, defined in #8411.

Description

This PR updates all metadata files for Azure Network checks to adapt to the new metadata format. The changes ensure consistency with the metadata structure being adopted across all Prowler services. The modified checks are:

  • network_bastion_host_exists
  • network_flow_log_captured_sent
  • network_flow_log_more_than_90_days
  • network_http_internet_access_restricted
  • network_public_ip_shodan
  • network_rdp_internet_access_restricted
  • network_ssh_internet_access_restricted
  • network_udp_internet_access_restricted
  • network_watcher_enabled

Checklist

API

  • Verify if API specs need to be regenerated.
  • Check if version updates are required (e.g., specs, Poetry, etc.).
  • Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the provider/azure Issues/PRs related with the Azure provider label Dec 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025

✅ All necessary CHANGELOG.md files have been updated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Conflict Markers Resolved

All conflict markers have been successfully resolved in this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.99%. Comparing base (b5095f5) to head (58a83cc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9624   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.99%   85.99%           
=======================================
  Files         222      222           
  Lines        5692     5692           
=======================================
  Hits         4895     4895           
  Misses        797      797           
Flag Coverage Δ
prowler-py3.10-azure 85.99% <ø> (ø)
prowler-py3.11-azure 85.99% <ø> (ø)
prowler-py3.12-azure 85.99% <ø> (ø)
prowler-py3.9-azure 85.99% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
prowler 85.99% <ø> (ø)
api ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025

🔒 Container Security Scan

Image: prowler:8e1257c
Last scan: 2026-02-04 10:55:54 UTC

📊 Vulnerability Summary

Severity Count
🔴 Critical 3
Total 3

3 package(s) affected

⚠️ Action Required

Critical severity vulnerabilities detected. These should be addressed before merging:

  • Review the detailed scan results
  • Update affected packages to patched versions
  • Consider using a different base image if updates are unavailable

📋 Resources:

@danibarranqueroo danibarranqueroo merged commit d447bdf into master Feb 4, 2026
37 checks passed
@danibarranqueroo danibarranqueroo deleted the review_metadata_azure_network branch February 4, 2026 10:56
Hamza-abughazaleh pushed a commit to Raed-sh/prowler that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
)

Co-authored-by: Daniel Barranquero <danielbo2001@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

metadata-review provider/azure Issues/PRs related with the Azure provider

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants