Skip to content

vRack - 3-AZ Failover priorities#9365

Open
SlimJ4 wants to merge 8 commits into
developfrom
sa-vrack-3az
Open

vRack - 3-AZ Failover priorities#9365
SlimJ4 wants to merge 8 commits into
developfrom
sa-vrack-3az

Conversation

@SlimJ4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@SlimJ4 SlimJ4 commented May 5, 2026

What type of Pull Request is this?

  • Update of existing guide(s)

Description

Added a section in Additional IPv4/6 for vRack guides, talking about managing 3-AZ failover priorities, detailing the benefits of doing so and the ways to manage these new mechanics.

Mandatory information

The translations in this Pull Request have been done using:

  • OVHcloud integrated translation LLM
  • Systran
  • Other tool : Claude
  • This Pull Request didn't require any translation.
  • This Pull Request shouldn't be merged before: 2026-06-21 > release date is fluctuating, this is the new goal. Please ask @jslocinski or myself for confirmation.

Added a section about managing 3-AZ failover priorities, detailing the benefits of doing so and the ways to manage these new mechanics.
@SlimJ4 SlimJ4 requested a review from jslocinski May 5, 2026 16:55
@SlimJ4 SlimJ4 added the Offer: Network The PR documents Network products: Additional IP, BYOIP, Load Balancer, vRack, OCC, etc label May 5, 2026
@SlimJ4 SlimJ4 marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2026 08:12
SlimJ4 and others added 4 commits May 15, 2026 16:31
Fixed incorrect button naming following access to a staging environment.
- Fix UI slot inconsistency in ipv6 EN-GB ("First failover" → "Secondary Zone")
- Remove duplicate primary callout in ip-block FR-FR
- Fix "au dessus" → "au-dessus" (compound preposition) in both FR files
- FR: "Tableau de bord" → "espace client" (CP terminology), inside the new section
- EN/FR rewording: tighter phrasing in the new section (Validate → Confirm, drop spatial filler, "expose pour" → "attribue à", etc.)
- Bump `updated:` to 2026-05-26 in all 4 files — this update must not be merged before that date

Suggestion (not applied — needs verification against the live CP / Manager sidebar):
The new section uses two naming styles for the same AZ priority slots within the same guide:

EN (ipv6 + ip-block):
- Prose description: "Primary Availability Zone" (long form)
- Panel slot list: "Primary Zone, Secondary Zone, Last resort Zone" (short form)

FR (ipv6 + ip-block):
- Prose description: "Zone de disponibilité principale", "Zone de disponibilité secondaire", "Zone de dernier recours"
- Panel slot list: "Zone principale, Zone secondaire, Zone de dernier recours" (short form)

Both languages mix long-form labels in prose with short-form labels in the panel
slot list. Worth aligning them once the actual NM panel labels are confirmed:
either standardise on the short form everywhere (preferred — matches the UI),
or keep the long form in prose only where it clarifies the concept and use the
exact UI label in the panel-slot list. Same fix applies symmetrically to EN and
FR so the localisations stay in sync.
Changed the structure of the paragraph that explains the mechanics of automatic priority assignment, in order to better conform to reality.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Offer: Network The PR documents Network products: Additional IP, BYOIP, Load Balancer, vRack, OCC, etc

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants