chore(deps): update dependency requests to v2.33.0 [security]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
requests (changelog)	==2.32.5 → ==2.33.0

---

Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function

CVE-2026-25645 / GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2

More information

Details

Impact

The requests.utils.extract_zipped_paths() utility function uses a predictable filename when extracting files from zip archives into the system temporary directory. If the target file already exists, it is reused without validation. A local attacker with write access to the temp directory could pre-create a malicious file that would be loaded in place of the legitimate one.

Affected usages

Standard usage of the Requests library is not affected by this vulnerability. Only applications that call extract_zipped_paths() directly are impacted.

Remediation

Upgrade to at least Requests 2.33.0, where the library now extracts files to a non-deterministic location.

If developers are unable to upgrade, they can set TMPDIR in their environment to a directory with restricted write access.

Severity

• CVSS Score: 4.4 / 10 (Medium)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

• https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisories/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2
• https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/66d21cb07bd6255b1280291c4fafb71803cdb3b7
• https://github.com/psf/requests/releases/tag/v2.33.0
• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25645
• https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Release Notes

psf/requests (requests)

v2.33.0

Compare Source

Announcements

• 📣 Requests is adding inline types. If you have a typed code base that
  uses Requests, please take a look at #​7271. Give it a try, and report
  any gaps or feedback you may have in the issue. 📣

Security

• CVE-2026-25645 requests.utils.extract_zipped_paths now extracts
  contents to a non-deterministic location to prevent malicious file
  replacement. This does not affect default usage of Requests, only
  applications calling the utility function directly.

Improvements

• Migrated to a PEP 517 build system using setuptools. (#​7012)

Bugfixes

• Fixed an issue where an empty netrc entry could cause
  malformed authentication to be applied to Requests on
  Python 3.11+. (#​7205)

Deprecations

• Dropped support for Python 3.9 following its end of support. (#​7196)

Documentation

• Various typo fixes and doc improvements.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • ""
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[github-actions]

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. Therefore, this pull request has been automatically marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs within seven days. Thank you for your contributions.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity

Metric	Results
Complexity	✅ 0 (≤ 20 complexity)

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +10.06% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +10.06% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (d8b47d4)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (604d1ef)	12252 (+3552)	5416 (+2445)	44.21% (+10.06%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#935)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

¹ Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}