Skip to content

feat: add kubekey skills#3075

Open
redscholar wants to merge 1 commit intokubesphere:mainfrom
redscholar:skills
Open

feat: add kubekey skills#3075
redscholar wants to merge 1 commit intokubesphere:mainfrom
redscholar:skills

Conversation

@redscholar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

the skills help to use kubekey.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for reviewers:

Does this PR introduced a user-facing change?

add kubekey skills

Additional documentation, usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: redscholar <[email protected]>
@kubesphere-prow kubesphere-prow Bot added release-note kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Apr 21, 2026
@kubesphere-prow
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: redscholar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubesphere-prow kubesphere-prow Bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 21, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new KubeKey skill, providing comprehensive documentation and reference guides for Kubernetes cluster lifecycle management. The additions include a main usage guide, a detailed configuration reference, and an inventory format guide. The review feedback identifies a typo and unit inconsistency in the etcd disk WAL configuration and suggests using private IP address ranges in inventory examples to ensure documentation accuracy and clarity.

# Cluster parameter constraints
cluster_require:
# etcd WAL fsync max latency (nanoseconds)
etcd_disk_wal_fysnc_duration_seconds: 10000000
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

There is a typo in the configuration key name: fysnc should be fsync. Additionally, there is a unit inconsistency between the key suffix (_seconds) and the example value (10000000), which the comment above describes as being in nanoseconds. This could lead to significant performance issues if the value is interpreted incorrectly by the tool.

Suggested change
etcd_disk_wal_fysnc_duration_seconds: 10000000
etcd_disk_wal_fsync_duration_seconds: 10000000

user: root
password: "123456"
# Or use private key: privateKeyPath: ~/.ssh/id_rsa
internal_ipv4: 1.1.1.1
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using 1.1.1.1 as an example for an internal IP address is misleading, as it is a well-known public IP address. It is better to use a private IP address range (e.g., 192.168.x.x) to represent internal cluster networking, consistent with the examples provided later in the document.

Suggested change
internal_ipv4: 1.1.1.1
internal_ipv4: 192.168.1.10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. release-note size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant