This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2023. It is now read-only.
Printing felt representation of types (currently on top of #65)#66
Draft
DomHenderson wants to merge 27 commits intokeep-starknet-strange:mainfrom
Draft
Printing felt representation of types (currently on top of #65)#66DomHenderson wants to merge 27 commits intokeep-starknet-strange:mainfrom
DomHenderson wants to merge 27 commits intokeep-starknet-strange:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
Currently we print either the raw value representing the felt return, or each field of the presumed to be non-nested struct. Additionally print_felt and print_double_felt are always included in the output, and felt values can be printed that are outside the range of [0, PRIME)
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Relevant files to look at in files changed are process/statements.rs and statements_processing/print/print_felt_representation.rs