Handle new AST nodes for var types in refaster#5825
Merged
Conversation
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_923373949
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8ac1316 to
46a7701
Compare
After https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8268850, VariableTree#getType will return null for implicit lambda parameter types. PiperOrigin-RevId: 923440562
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_923373949
branch
from
46a7701 to
5d1df3d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Handle new AST nodes for
vartypes in refasterAfter https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8268850, VariableTree#getType will return null for implicit lambda parameter types.