Skip to content

pyrobird: limit setuptools to :76 due to project.license#908

Open
wdconinc wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
pyrobird-setuptools-license
Open

pyrobird: limit setuptools to :76 due to project.license#908
wdconinc wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
pyrobird-setuptools-license

Conversation

@wdconinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wdconinc wdconinc commented May 9, 2026

Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Please link to any relevant presentations or discussions.

Since pyrobird uses the deprecated project.license in pyproject.toml, we should restrict setuptools to at most 76.

What is the urgency of this PR?

  • High (please describe reason below)
  • Medium
  • Low

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Please check if any of the following apply

  • This PR introduces breaking changes. Please describe changes users need to make below.
  • This PR changes default behavior. Please describe changes below.
  • AI was used in preparing this PR. Please describe usage below.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 9, 2026 17:17
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts the Spack recipe for pyrobird to avoid newer setuptools behavior that breaks builds when a project uses the deprecated project.license field in pyproject.toml. The change aligns dependency resolution with the known-working setuptools range for [email protected]:.

Changes:

  • Constrain the build dependency on py-setuptools for [email protected]: to @61:76 to prevent selecting newer setuptools versions that reject deprecated project.license.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@wdconinc wdconinc force-pushed the pyrobird-setuptools-license branch from 7cc4825 to 23349e4 Compare May 13, 2026 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants