eos_acls: Fix missing 'standard' keyword in replaced state

[PcInfamy]

SUMMARY

Fixes issue where eos_acls module with state: replaced did not generate the standard keyword for standard ACLs.

When using state: "replaced" on a standard ACL, the generated commands were missing the standard keyword (e.g., ip access-list test-acl instead of ip access-list standard test-acl). This caused the ACL to be created as an extended ACL instead of a standard one.

The fix ensures that the standard key from the ACL configuration is properly passed to the command generation logic for new ACLs in replaced state.

Fixes #608

ISSUE TYPE

• Bugfix Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

eos_acls

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Before the fix:

- name: "Deploy test ACL"
  arista.eos.eos_acls:
    config:
      - afi: "ipv4"
        acls:
          - name: "test-acl"
            standard: true
            aces:
              - grant: "permit"
                sequence: 10
                source:
                  host: "192.168.1.1"
    state: "replaced"

Generated commands (incorrect):

ip access-list test-acl
10 permit host 192.168.1.1

After the fix:
Generated commands (correct):

ip access-list standard test-acl
10 permit host 192.168.1.1

Changes made:

• Modified _state_replaced in plugins/module_utils/network/eos/config/acls/acls.py to pass the full ACL configuration (including standard key) when creating new ACLs
• Added unit tests test_eos_acls_replaced_standard and test_eos_acls_replaced_extended
• Added changelog fragment documenting the fix

**Test Results:**
The new test `test_eos_acls_replaced_standard` passes, confirming that `state: replaced` now correctly generates the `standard` keyword for standard ACLs. The fix ensures consistency with `state: merged` behavior.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
12 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[PcInfamy]

@Ruchip16
@komaldesai13
@rohitthakur2590

Sorry for the headache - I messed up my previous PR. This one should be good to go.

[rohitthakur2590]

@PcInfamy thank you for the contribution , this looks good could you please ensure its rebased/updated

[PcInfamy]

@PcInfamy thank you for the contribution , this looks good could you please ensure its rebased/updated

@rohitthakur2590 ready!

[rohitthakur2590]

@PcInfamy thanks for the contribution!
the branch is behind main. Could you please update it so we can merge.

[PcInfamy]

@PcInfamy thanks for the contribution! the branch is behind main. Could you please update it so we can merge.

@rohitthakur2590 done!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[rohitthakur2590]

@PcInfamy thanks for the contribution! the branch is behind main. Could you please update it so we can merge.

@rohitthakur2590 done!

thank you , all tests passed successfully , but as other PR got merged before this one , you will have to again rebase this .