Skip to content

Tweaked language on descriptions.#39

Open
rzellem wants to merge 3 commits intoRomanSpaceTelescope:developfrom
rzellem:issue_17
Open

Tweaked language on descriptions.#39
rzellem wants to merge 3 commits intoRomanSpaceTelescope:developfrom
rzellem:issue_17

Conversation

@rzellem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rzellem rzellem commented May 20, 2025

To address issue #17

@rzellem rzellem requested review from jschlieder and mrtommyb May 20, 2025 17:04
@rzellem rzellem self-assigned this May 20, 2025
@rzellem rzellem changed the base branch from main to develop May 20, 2025 17:04
@rzellem rzellem requested a review from tddesjardins May 23, 2025 14:53
@tddesjardins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Question: for the prism, the original description said per pixel, so that makes sense to me to add extra clarity. For the grism, it did not say per pixel, it said for a "(2-pixel resolving power) point source," so are we sure these are values per pixel or per resolution element?

@rzellem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

rzellem commented May 23, 2025

Hmm...yeah this is a little confusing, tbh.

@jschlieder - what do you think?

# - {name: wavelength, unit: um, datatype: float64, description: wavelength in microns}
# - {name: fline_point, unit: erg / (cm*cm) / s, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a (2-pixel resolving power) point source's emission line's integrated flux in units of 1E-17 ergs/cm^2/sec.}
# - {name: mAB_point, unit: ABmag, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a (2-pixel resolving power) point source's continua in units of AB magnitude at which S/N=5 per pixel.}
# - {name: mAB_point, unit: ABmag / pix, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma (per pixel) detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a (2-pixel resolving power) point source's continua in units of AB magnitude per pixel.}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have some confusion on whether the mAB limit for point sources needs to include the "(2-pixel resolving power)" statement. It seems that for point sources the limiting magnitude calculation was done per-pixel.

# - {name: mAB_point, unit: ABmag / pix, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma (per pixel) detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a (2-pixel resolving power) point source's continua in units of AB magnitude per pixel.}
# - {name: fline_galaxy, unit: erg / (cm*cm) / s, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a compact galaxy's (with half-light radius of 0.3 arcseconds) emission line's integrated flux in units of 1E-17 ergs/cm^2/sec.}
# - {name: mAB_galaxy, unit: ABmag, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a compact galaxy's (with half-light radius of 0.3 arcseconds) continua in units of AB magnitude at which S/N=5 per pixel.}
# - {name: mAB_galaxy, unit: ABmag / pix, datatype: float64, description: 5-sigma (per pixel) detection limit for a 1-hour exposure time with zodiacal light background at twice the minimum intensity for a compact galaxy's (with half-light radius of 0.3 arcseconds) continua in units of AB magnitude per pixel.}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same confusion here, I am not sure if the unit should be ABmag/pix or ABmag/2 pix or something similar for this extended galaxy. Might have to reach out to James Rhodes for clarification since he put this part of the Grism performance table together.

@mrtommyb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rzellem is this PR on hold?

@rzellem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

rzellem commented Aug 13, 2025

Yes, @mrtommyb - waiting on the input from James Rhodes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants