Currently, we allow the user to create multiple storageClusters in the same namespace, expect the first storage cluster others are marked as Ignored.
We should restrict creating the second storageCluster in the same namespace using a webhook.
Originally Posted in #2844 (comment)
@malayparida2000 I understand what you are saying, but that is a scenario we should
not address this way. That is a user error, and if we want to solve it we should introduce
a webhook to prevent the creation of a second storage cluster.
Currently, we allow the user to create multiple storageClusters in the same namespace, expect the first storage cluster others are marked as Ignored.
We should restrict creating the second storageCluster in the same namespace using a webhook.
Originally Posted in #2844 (comment)