Better exports name

[mrleblanc101]

Hi,
Why is called forward and toPoint ?
When using esm import, the function name are not clear at all.
Shouldn't it use clearer name like: mgrsToLatlong and latlongtoMgrs ?

So instead of this:

import { forward, toPoint } from 'mgrs';

mgrs = forward([form.value.local.lat, form.value.local.long]);
const [lat, long] = toPoint(form.value.local.mgrs);

We would have this:

import { latlongtoMgrs, mgrsToLatlong } from 'mgrs';

mgrs = latlongtoMgrs([form.value.local.lat, form.value.local.long]);
const [lat, long] = mgrsToLatlong(form.value.local.mgrs);

[mrleblanc101]

I guess I could rename while destructuring:

import { forward as llToMgrs, toPoint as mgrsToLatlong } from 'mgrs';

[mrleblanc101]

Or maybe LLtoMGRS and MGRStoLL like the internal LLtoUTM and UTMtoLL function.
But I prefer the camelCase names.

[mrleblanc101]

I think the name of the inverse function make even less sense.
It does convert "the other way", meaning to takes a MGRS to a Latlong, but so does the toPoint function.
The only difference between toPoint and inverse is that one return a coordinate, and the other return a bounding box (array of coordinates).
So I think it should probably be called something like mgrsToBoundingLatlong or MGRStoBoundingLL depending on what is chosen for the other functions.

[mrleblanc101]

I don't mind opening a PR for this.
This would be a breaking change, so it would need to be released as a 3.0.0, unless we keep both names (but deprecate the older one).
I don't think this is something major, as people would only need to rename the function when upgrading, basically just a find and replace.