-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[Feature]: Improve ambient telemetry realism and modeling assumptions #6
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
apiHTTP routes, contracts, request & response shapes, AI spec, and client-server integration concernsHTTP routes, contracts, request & response shapes, AI spec, and client-server integration concernsbackendServer logic, data, db access, validation, rate limiting, AI integrations, & app behavior behind APIServer logic, data, db access, validation, rate limiting, AI integrations, & app behavior behind APIhelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is needed
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
apiHTTP routes, contracts, request & response shapes, AI spec, and client-server integration concernsHTTP routes, contracts, request & response shapes, AI spec, and client-server integration concernsbackendServer logic, data, db access, validation, rate limiting, AI integrations, & app behavior behind APIServer logic, data, db access, validation, rate limiting, AI integrations, & app behavior behind APIhelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is needed
Area
API or backend
What problem are you trying to solve?
The ambient telemetry layer is part of the product’s atmosphere and worldbuilding, but it should become more internally consistent and better grounded in explicit modeling assumptions.
Proposed solution
Improve one or more telemetry domains and document the assumptions clearly enough that future contributors can extend them intentionally.
Acceptance criteria:
Alternatives considered
Scope and impact
Relevant code:
artifacts/api-server/src/routes/ambient.tsartifacts/api-server/src/lib/marsTime.tsartifacts/api-server/src/lib/missionTelemetry.tsNotes:
This issue is better for someone comfortable with modeling, systems thinking, or space-domain research.
Pre-flight checks