Analysing a few games reveals some improvements that can be made.
e.g. 1. d4 outputs data saying a better move is available...
Why not allow filter for e.g. not annotating changes that are below a threshold (e.g. 0.50)
--threshold 0.50
Secondly, there is a log of analysis in a game that is already lost/won. Why not add a filter not to analyse after score is e.g. +2/-2
--limitscore 2.00
Thirdly, it would be nice to output stardard NAG inside the PGN text instead of comments.
--outputnag std|apgn|both
It would also be nice to output cp scores in PGN compatible output. [%eval ...]
--evaltags std|apgn|both
Analysing a few games reveals some improvements that can be made.
e.g. 1. d4 outputs data saying a better move is available...
Why not allow filter for e.g. not annotating changes that are below a threshold (e.g. 0.50)
--threshold 0.50
Secondly, there is a log of analysis in a game that is already lost/won. Why not add a filter not to analyse after score is e.g. +2/-2
--limitscore 2.00
Thirdly, it would be nice to output stardard NAG inside the PGN text instead of comments.
--outputnag std|apgn|both
It would also be nice to output cp scores in PGN compatible output. [%eval ...]
--evaltags std|apgn|both