Archive Updated: February 7, 2026
Version Status: 1.5.0-dev (Alpha, targeting Beta/RC)
This directory contains archived documentation from various development phases of ThemisDB. These documents are preserved for historical reference but are no longer actively maintained or should not be used for current implementation status.
Current Documentation Hub: docs/00_DOCUMENTATION_INDEX.md
GAP (Gap Analysis Program) documents from various development phases. These identified missing features and planned implementations that have since been completed or superseded.
Historical roadmap documents showing the planned evolution of ThemisDB features. Current roadmap information is in CHANGELOG.md and release notes.
TODO lists and task tracking documents from earlier development phases. Current tasks are tracked via GitHub Issues and Projects.
Implementation summary documents from completed features and migrations. These provide historical context for major system changes.
Original Date: January 15, 2026
Status: ❌ OUTDATED - Do Not Use
Why Archived:
- Written during early development phase
- Claimed "60% complete" when actual status is 100%
- Reported "stubs" and "simulations" that don't exist in current code
- Assessment was valid at time of writing but gaps have been closed
Superseded By:
docs/LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md(comprehensive audit)docs/LLM_CORE_AUDIT_REPORT.md(detailed findings)
Key Discrepancies:
| Claim in Archive | Actual Status (Audit) |
|---|---|
| "60% Complete" | 100% Complete |
| "Stub implementations" | 0 stubs in core |
| "Dummy embeddings" | Real embeddings from base model |
| "Sleep simulations" | 0 sleep in inference paths |
| "ThemisDB loading unimplemented" | Fully implemented |
Historical Context: This document was an investigation report identifying work to be done, not a status report of completed work. It served its purpose in January 2026 by highlighting gaps that needed fixing. Those gaps have since been closed.
Use Case: Historical reference only - to understand what gaps existed in mid-January 2026
Status: May be archived if found to contain conflicting LoRA status
Reason: Would contradict current LoRA framework status
Superseded By: docs/LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md Section 5
Historical gap analysis documents moved to /gaps/ subdirectory. These identified missing features during development that have been completed.
Current Status Tracking: GitHub Issues and Milestones
Historical roadmaps moved to /roadmaps/ subdirectory. These planned feature evolution across versions.
Current Roadmap: CHANGELOG.md and Release Notes
Task lists and planning documents moved to /todos/ subdirectory.
Current Task Tracking: GitHub Issues and Project Boards
Historical implementation summaries moved to /implementation-summaries/ subdirectory.
Current Documentation: Feature-specific docs in main docs tree
The following historical root-level documents were moved into this archive structure during the documentation hygiene cleanup pass:
/gaps/GAP_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md/implementation-summaries/GAP_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md/implementation-summaries/LLM_DEPLOYMENT_PLUGIN_SUMMARY.md/implementation-summaries/METADATA_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md/implementation-summaries/REVIEW_SUMMARY.txt/todos/issue_3491_sub_issue_1.md
The following active status documents were moved out of the repository root into active documentation areas instead of being archived:
docs/development/CURRENT_STATUS.mddocs/development/DEVELOPMENT_STATUS.mddocs/en/llm/EUROPEAN_ACADEMIC_MODELS_GUIDE.md
Reason: 95% accurate, only minor vision caveat missing
Action: Added cross-reference to Master for completeness
Reason: Accurate core assessment (100%), integration status outdated but useful historical record
Action: Added note about integration progress since publication
Reason: Detailed component verification, mostly accurate
Action: Added header pointing to Master for complete picture
Reason: Detailed integration planning, still relevant
Action: Update integration percentages to reflect current state
- DO: Read archived docs for historical context
- DON'T: Rely on them for current status
- START HERE:
docs/LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md
- DO: Reference Master document for status
- DON'T: Quote percentages from archived docs
- CITE: LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md in all communications
- DO: Use audit report findings as evidence
- DON'T: Flag "gaps" already closed
- CHECK: LLM_CORE_AUDIT_REPORT.md for detailed analysis
Documents should be archived when:
- ✅ Superseded by more accurate/recent assessment
- ✅ Contains significant factual errors
- ✅ Causes confusion among stakeholders
- ✅ Contradicts code audit findings
Documents should be kept when:
- ✅ Mostly accurate (>90%)
- ✅ Provides unique historical value
- ✅ Contains useful implementation details
- ✅ Can be updated with minor corrections
Archived documents will not be restored unless:
- Code audit is proven incorrect (requires re-audit)
- Implementation regresses to match archived assessment
- Historical context requires unarchival
- Master Status:
docs/LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md - Detailed Audit:
docs/LLM_CORE_AUDIT_REPORT.md - Decision Matrix:
docs/LLM_CORE_DECISION_MATRIX.md
- Audit Date: January 19, 2026
- Auditor: GitHub Copilot Agent
- Scope: Complete LLM Core (6 components)
- Confidence: 95-100% per component
- EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_GAPS_ANALYSIS.md published
- Identified gaps during development phase
- LLM_IMPLEMENTATION_COMPLETE.md published
- Claimed 100% completion (mostly accurate)
- Comprehensive code audit conducted
- Master documentation established
- Conflicting docs archived
- Truth definitively determined
Effective Date: January 19, 2026
All stakeholders are notified that:
- Single Source of Truth:
docs/LLM_CORE_STATUS_MASTER.md - Archived Docs: Historical reference only, not current status
- Decision Authority: Code audit findings override all previous claims
- Communication: Cite Master document in all status updates
Archive Maintained By: ThemisDB LLM Team
Last Updated: January 19, 2026
Next Review: After v1.3.6 release