ButtonTemplate not working

[seenickcode]

Users are forced to use GenericTemplate instead of ButtonTemplate because ButtonTemplate requires a 'buttons' field, not 'elements' field.

mq.Template(template.GenericTemplate{Title: title,
		Buttons: []template.Button{
			{
				Type:    template.ButtonTypePostback,
				Payload: postbackPayload,
				Title:   buttonTitle,
			},
		},
	})

[maciekmm]

Hello, @seenickcode
It indeed looks like facebook has changed the way it handles templates now. It requires a bit more work than I thought it would. I will eventually get this fixed, but pull requests are more than welcome :)

Thanks for reporting the issue.

[seenickcode]

Great thank you.

…

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Maciej Mionskowski < ***@***.***> wrote: Hello, @seenickcode <https://github.com/seenickcode> It indeed looks like facebook has changed the way it handles templates now. It requires a bit more work than I thought it would. I will eventually get this fixed, but pull requests are more than welcome :) Thanks for reporting the issue. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEoOa7hqZtCsF7KFiaxEKu9dDA26wgAks5sHVWmgaJpZM4ODfYo> .

-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Nicholas

[seenickcode]

Ok opened #31

[seenickcode]

Hey @maciekmm could you take a look when you get a chance? I have another PR I'm waiting to open too once this fix is complete. Thanks.

[stanleyye]

@seenickcode @maciekmm any updates?

[maciekmm]

@stanleyye @seenickcode 's contribution unfortunately does not meet coding standards of this repository. I am currently pretty busy and thus having no time to contribute. If you happen to implement this feature on your own please consider doing a pull request.

[seenickcode]

It appears that this library is abandonware because Facebook changes its features often as the @maciekmm doesn't have time to maintain. The PR I submitted doesn't "meet coding standards" because the test coverage went down by 5.7%. I'm not sure how to submit a PR of a fork. Does this article explain a recommendation properly? http://blog.campoy.cat/2014/03/github-and-go-forking-pull-requests-and.html if so I will follow it and re-submit.

[cee-dub]

I followed roughly those steps with my recent successful PR here #24.

[maciekmm]

@seenickcode It doesn't even pass the remaining tests. I am okay with lowering coverage a bit for a short period of time if there are benefits to that. But I am not okay with the travis not building it correctly.

[seenickcode]

That's fair and I forgot about that they were indeed failing. Will revisit this next month because too busy now unfortunately.

…

On Aug 9, 2017, 7:37 PM +0200, Maciej Mionskowski ***@***.***>, wrote: @seenickcode It doesn't even pass the remaining tests. I am okay with lowering coverage a bit for a short period of time if there are benefits to that. But I am not okay with the travis not building it correctly. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.