Project: ok_json
Language: C99
Target Standard: MISRA C:2012
Assessment Basis: cppcheck MISRA analysis results
Purpose: Project compliance tracking and repository transparency
This document tracks the current MISRA C:2012 status of the ok_json codebase.
It is intended to provide a clear, maintainable record of the project's current static-analysis posture and known exceptions. It is not a formal certification artifact and does not by itself constitute full MISRA compliance.
Current status is based on the cppcheck MISRA analysis results for the project.
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Pass | Currently passing in the project's cppcheck MISRA analysis |
| Planned Refactor | Currently deferred pending future code refactoring |
| Manual Review Needed | May require manual review, process evidence, or analysis beyond current tool results |
| N/A / Out of Scope | Not applicable to the current project scope or not claimed by this matrix |
ok_json is being developed toward MISRA C:2012 compliance.
Based on the current cppcheck MISRA analysis results:
- all currently checked MISRA C:2012 rules are passing
- all previously known outstanding rule failures have been refactored and resolved
- no currently suppressed MISRA rule exceptions are being tracked in this matrix
Accordingly, the project should presently be described as:
passing cppcheck MISRA C:2012 analysis with no known outstanding rule failures
The project should avoid overstating this as formal or complete MISRA compliance without the additional process evidence normally associated with a full compliance claim, such as:
- tool/version/configuration contro
- documented review scope
- manual review where needed
- deviation records if ever applicable
- assessment of tool limitations
- None
- Current status: All pass in current
cppcheckMISRA analysis
| Rule | Short Topic Summary | Current Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| All rules checked by the current analysis configuration | Various | Pass | Passing in current cppcheck MISRA analysis. |
| Rule | Planned Action | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | No current exceptions tracked. | N/A |
This matrix reflects the current project tracking state and should be read with the following limitations in mind:
-
Tool-based results are not the whole compliance story.
MISRA compliance generally involves more than static-analysis output. It may also require:- documented deviations
- manual code review
- process evidence
- tool configuration records
- assessment of tool limitations
-
This matrix is based on current reported
cppcheckresults.
It should be updated whenever:- the code changes materially
- the tool version changes
- the MISRA configuration changes
-
Some MISRA rules may require subject-matter expert review and judgment.
Static-analysis results should be treated as important evidence, not as the sole basis for compliance claims.
This file is intended to support:
- transparent project status reporting
- internal compliance tracking
- future remediation planning
- eventual CI enforcement and deviation management
Recommended future enhancements:
- Record the exact
cppcheckversion used for MISRA analysis. - Record the exact MISRA analysis configuration used in CI.
- Add links to tracked issues or TODO items for each failing rule.
- Separate future matrices into:
- Required rules
- Advisory rules
- Add a deviation record if any current exceptions remain intentional long-term.
The following wording is recommended:
ok_jsoncurrently passes the project'scppcheckMISRA C:2012 analysis with no known outstanding rule failures in the analyzed configurations. This reflects current static-analysis results and should not be interpreted as formal MISRA certification by itself.
This document should be updated whenever any of the following occurs:
- a failing rule is remediated
- a new failure is introduced
- the MISRA analysis toolchain changes
- the project’s compliance claims change
- formal deviation records are added
At the time of writing, the ok_json project appears to be in a strong state from a cppcheck MISRA static-analysis perspective.
That is a meaningful project-quality signal.
The most accurate characterization is:
passes all current cppcheck MISRA analysis; formal compliance still depends on broader process and evidence beyond tool output alone