Skip to content

Question on quality of Training Files #341

@ChrisSmithUNR

Description

@ChrisSmithUNR

First, thanks so much for helping create this awesome tool!

I am a PhD student, trying to train a model to identify American pika vocalizations, and relatively new to bioacoustics. I have a couple questions:

  1. How important is it to have only high-quality training data vs sonograms with calls only faintly showing up? I have a wide range, and was wondering how it was likely to impact the model.

  2. One recorder was placed near a stream. How important is it to do a high-pass band filter to remove lower pitched background noise? (Pika frequency is well above the background)

  3. Pika vocalizations are repeated notes in various rhythms, classified as either a "short call" (a few notes) or a "long call" (usually 5+ notes strung together). The individual notes of a "short call" and "long call" are quite similar structure...it is just the repetition and gaps in between notes that are different. Is there a way to help the model recognize the difference between these 2 calls, given that there are often few differences within the 3-second sample window?

Thanks for your help!

Image of Sonogram of calls types:
wdfw02210.pdf

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions