[integ-tests] Check there is no defunct Slurm parameters

[hanwen-cluster]

Description of changes

• This check is added to Slurm accounting tests, because they contain more Slurm parameters than other tests

Tests

The following tests have passed

{%- import 'common.jinja2' as common with context -%}
{{- common.OSS_COMMERCIAL_X86.append("rocky8") or "" -}}
{{- common.OSS_COMMERCIAL_X86.append("rocky9") or "" -}}
---
test-suites:
  schedulers:
    test_slurm_accounting.py::test_slurm_accounting:
      dimensions:
        - regions: ["ap-south-1"]
          instances:  {{ common.INSTANCES_DEFAULT_X86 }}
          oss: ["alinux2023"]
          schedulers: ["slurm"]
    test_slurm_accounting.py::test_slurm_accounting_external_dbd:
      dimensions:
        - regions: [ "ap-south-1" ]
          instances: {{ common.INSTANCES_DEFAULT_X86 }}
          oss: ["ubuntu2404"]
          schedulers: ["slurm"]

References

aws/aws-parallelcluster-cookbook#3165 should be merged before this PR

Github issue: #7319

Checklist

• Make sure you are pointing to the right branch.
• If you're creating a patch for a branch other than develop add the branch name as prefix in the PR title (e.g. [release-3.6]).
• Check all commits' messages are clear, describing what and why vs how.
• Make sure to have added unit tests or integration tests to cover the new/modified code.
• Check if documentation is impacted by this change.

Please review the guidelines for contributing and Pull Request Instructions.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[gmarciani]

Good job adding this check!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.07%. Comparing base (a1e1583) to head (dda405e).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #7342      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    90.08%   90.07%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          182      182              
  Lines        16730    16732       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits         15071    15072       +1     
- Misses        1659     1660       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.07% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gmarciani]

Took over to unblock the merge: #7351