You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Team, is it feasible to add a additional command that outputs the set of files that should not be scanned since they are completely static and does not have executable code bits and should be ideally left out of scans like , sca, sast and dast.
Thanks, looking forward to opinions on this, since I am maintaining a manual file to check if my repo has a set of static files, not eligible for a scan
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Team, is it feasible to add a additional command that outputs the set of files that should not be scanned since they are completely static and does not have executable code bits and should be ideally left out of scans like , sca, sast and dast.
Thanks, looking forward to opinions on this, since I am maintaining a manual file to check if my repo has a set of static files, not eligible for a scan
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions