Adding visual cues to differentiate the output of functions with "TODO" or "WIP" in their names would aid developers in quickly identifying incomplete or work-in-progress test sections.
Motivation:
- Readability: Clear visual indicators improve code comprehension.
- Prioritization: Visual cues help prioritize tasks effectively.
- Efficiency: Reducing manual inspection time and cognitive load during code reviews.
Color Recommendations:
For "TODO" functions: Use a blue color to indicate tasks that need to be addressed in the future.
For "WIP" functions: Use a yellow color to denote work-in-progress code that is actively being developed or modified.
Using a blue color for "TODO" functions would provide a clear distinction from the red color used for missing test functions. The yellow color for "WIP" functions would maintain consistency with common conventions for indicating ongoing work.
Adding visual cues to differentiate the output of functions with "TODO" or "WIP" in their names would aid developers in quickly identifying incomplete or work-in-progress test sections.
Motivation:
Color Recommendations:
For "TODO" functions: Use a blue color to indicate tasks that need to be addressed in the future.
For "WIP" functions: Use a yellow color to denote work-in-progress code that is actively being developed or modified.
Using a blue color for "TODO" functions would provide a clear distinction from the red color used for missing test functions. The yellow color for "WIP" functions would maintain consistency with common conventions for indicating ongoing work.