Skip to content

Commit bc6da1b

Browse files
mistial-devmistial-dev
committed
Initial import
0 parents  commit bc6da1b

17 files changed

+1576
-0
lines changed

‎.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md‎

Lines changed: 32 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1+
# Issue Template
2+
3+
## Issue Type
4+
- [ ] Policy clarification request
5+
- [ ] Template improvement suggestion
6+
- [ ] Documentation enhancement
7+
- [ ] Implementation question
8+
- [ ] Bug report (broken template/link)
9+
10+
## Description
11+
Provide a clear description of the issue or improvement suggestion.
12+
13+
## Current Situation
14+
Describe what currently exists (if applicable).
15+
16+
## Proposed Improvement
17+
Describe the specific change or addition you're suggesting.
18+
19+
## Use Case Context
20+
Explain the project type or situation where this would be helpful:
21+
- Project size (small team, large community, etc.)
22+
- Platform (GitHub, GitLab, internal tools, etc.)
23+
- Domain (open source library, research project, etc.)
24+
25+
## Implementation Considerations
26+
Any thoughts on how this should be implemented or potential challenges.
27+
28+
## Additional Context
29+
Include any other relevant information, examples, or references.
30+
31+
---
32+
**Note:** This repository focuses on practical improvements to the Bounded Contribution Policy framework. Please ensure your issue relates to policy implementation, clarification, or supporting resources.

‎.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md‎

Lines changed: 46 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
1+
# Pull Request
2+
3+
## Summary
4+
Brief description of the changes made.
5+
6+
## Changes Made
7+
- [ ] Policy document updates
8+
- [ ] Template additions/improvements
9+
- [ ] Documentation enhancements
10+
- [ ] Implementation guide updates
11+
- [ ] Example additions
12+
13+
## Problem Addressed
14+
Describe the specific issue or improvement this addresses.
15+
16+
## Implementation Details
17+
### What Changed
18+
Explain the specific modifications made.
19+
20+
### Why This Approach
21+
Describe the reasoning behind the implementation choices.
22+
23+
### Testing/Validation
24+
How have you verified these changes work as intended?
25+
- [ ] Tested templates with example projects
26+
- [ ] Reviewed language for clarity
27+
- [ ] Checked links and references
28+
- [ ] Validated against different project types
29+
30+
## Impact Assessment
31+
### Who Benefits
32+
Describe which types of projects or users will benefit from these changes.
33+
34+
### Compatibility
35+
- [ ] Maintains compatibility with existing implementations
36+
- [ ] No breaking changes to core principles
37+
- [ ] Works across different platforms and project types
38+
39+
## Documentation Updates
40+
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation
41+
- [ ] Added examples where appropriate
42+
- [ ] Updated FAQ if needed
43+
- [ ] Checked cross-references and links
44+
45+
---
46+
**Policy Alignment:** This contribution maintains the Bounded Contribution Policy's focus on practical technical collaboration improvements while preserving core principles of neutrality and individual evaluation.

‎BOUNDED_CONTRIBUTION_POLICY.md‎

Lines changed: 30 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1+
# Bounded Contribution Policy
2+
3+
## Contribution and Discussion Policy
4+
5+
This project is dedicated to building and maintaining a specific technical product. To support that goal, all contributions and discussions must align with the following principles:
6+
7+
### Project Relevance
8+
All contributions must directly support the project's technical goals. Off-topic discussions, regardless of intent, are out of scope.
9+
10+
### Individual Evaluation
11+
Contributions are evaluated individually, based on their technical value and relevance to the project. Personal identity, background, seniority, or organizational affiliation do not factor into acceptance decisions.
12+
13+
### Focused Communication
14+
Discussions should be clear, concise, and directly related to the problem at hand. Extended commentary or general debate is discouraged unless it advances the project's technical objectives.
15+
16+
### Constructive Interaction
17+
Feedback should be specific, actionable, and directed toward improving the work. General critique without context or suggested improvements is not helpful to the project.
18+
19+
### Maintainer Discretion
20+
Project maintainers are not obligated to respond to all input. Engagement is prioritized based on project needs, technical relevance, and available resources.
21+
22+
### Neutral Environment
23+
This project maintains a neutral technical focus. Social, political, or ideological discussions are outside the project's scope. Participation must reflect this technical orientation.
24+
25+
### Enforcement
26+
These principles will be applied consistently. Violations may result in rejection of contributions, removal of access, or other actions deemed necessary by project maintainers to maintain project focus.
27+
28+
## Purpose
29+
30+
This policy provides a framework for maintaining focused, productive technical collaboration by establishing clear boundaries around project scope and contribution evaluation criteria.

‎CHANGELOG.md‎

Lines changed: 44 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
1+
# Changelog
2+
3+
All notable changes to the Bounded Contribution Policy will be documented in this file.
4+
5+
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
6+
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
7+
8+
## [1.0.0] - 2025-08-05
9+
10+
### Added
11+
- Initial release of the Bounded Contribution Policy
12+
- Core policy document with seven key principles
13+
- Comprehensive README with overview and quick start guide
14+
- MIT License for free adoption and modification
15+
- Adoption Guide with step-by-step implementation instructions
16+
- Customization Guide for adapting the policy to different contexts
17+
- Template collection for common platforms and scenarios:
18+
- GitHub issue and pull request templates
19+
- Discord/Slack channel rules
20+
- README badge templates
21+
- Contributing guidelines snippets
22+
- FAQ document addressing common questions
23+
- Rationale document explaining the technical benefits and design decisions
24+
- Examples document with practical application scenarios
25+
- GitHub community templates for issues and pull requests
26+
- Contributing guidelines for improving the policy itself
27+
28+
### Features
29+
- **Project-Focused Framework**: Clear boundaries around technical objectives
30+
- **Individual Evaluation**: Merit-based assessment without identity considerations
31+
- **Neutral Environment**: Technical focus separate from social/political topics
32+
- **Maintainer Autonomy**: Project leadership discretion in decision-making
33+
- **Platform Independence**: Works across different development environments
34+
- **Scalable Implementation**: Suitable for projects of all sizes
35+
- **Comprehensive Templates**: Ready-to-use implementations for common scenarios
36+
37+
### Documentation
38+
- Complete adoption and customization guidance
39+
- Real-world examples and response templates
40+
- FAQ covering implementation and enforcement questions
41+
- Technical rationale explaining design decisions
42+
- Contributing guidelines for policy improvements
43+
44+
[1.0.0]: https://github.com/mistial-dev/BoundedContributionPolicy/releases/tag/v1.0.0

‎CONTRIBUTING.md‎

Lines changed: 122 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
1+
# Contributing to the Bounded Contribution Policy
2+
3+
Thank you for your interest in improving the Bounded Contribution Policy. This document outlines how to contribute to the policy itself.
4+
5+
## Contribution Guidelines
6+
7+
This project follows its own Bounded Contribution Policy, focusing on practical improvements to the policy framework and implementation resources.
8+
9+
### Types of Contributions Welcome
10+
11+
**Policy Improvements**
12+
- Clarification of existing principles
13+
- Simplification of language
14+
- Correction of ambiguities or inconsistencies
15+
16+
**Implementation Resources**
17+
- Additional templates for common platforms
18+
- Improved adoption guidance
19+
- Better customization examples
20+
21+
**Documentation Enhancements**
22+
- FAQ additions based on common questions
23+
- Clearer rationale explanations
24+
- Practical implementation examples
25+
26+
**Technical Infrastructure**
27+
- Website improvements
28+
- Template validation
29+
- Documentation organization
30+
31+
### What's Not In Scope
32+
33+
- Fundamental changes to core principles
34+
- Addition of identity-based evaluation criteria
35+
- Expansion beyond technical contribution management
36+
- Complex governance structures or processes
37+
38+
## How to Contribute
39+
40+
### Suggesting Improvements
41+
42+
1. **Review existing materials** to understand current approach
43+
2. **Check existing issues** to avoid duplicates
44+
3. **Create a specific issue** describing the improvement
45+
4. **Focus on practical benefits** of the proposed change
46+
47+
### Submitting Changes
48+
49+
1. **Fork the repository**
50+
2. **Make focused changes** addressing specific issues
51+
3. **Test with real examples** when possible
52+
4. **Submit a pull request** with clear description
53+
54+
### Discussion Guidelines
55+
56+
**Be Specific:** Describe concrete problems or improvements rather than general feedback.
57+
58+
**Provide Examples:** Include real-world scenarios where changes would help.
59+
60+
**Focus on Implementation:** Consider how suggestions would work in practice.
61+
62+
**Maintain Neutrality:** Keep language professional and non-inflammatory.
63+
64+
## Review Process
65+
66+
### Evaluation Criteria
67+
Contributions are assessed based on:
68+
- **Practical utility** for projects adopting the policy
69+
- **Clarity improvement** over existing materials
70+
- **Consistency** with core principles
71+
- **Implementation feasibility** across different contexts
72+
73+
### Review Timeline
74+
- Initial review within one week
75+
- Feedback provided for improvements needed
76+
- Final decision based on alignment with project objectives
77+
78+
### Acceptance Standards
79+
Changes must:
80+
- Improve practical utility without compromising core principles
81+
- Maintain neutral, professional tone
82+
- Include appropriate documentation updates
83+
- Work across different project types and platforms
84+
85+
## Specific Areas for Contribution
86+
87+
### Template Improvements
88+
- Additional platform integrations
89+
- Better response templates for common scenarios
90+
- Improved customization guidance
91+
92+
### Documentation Clarity
93+
- Simpler language for complex concepts
94+
- Better examples and use cases
95+
- More comprehensive FAQ responses
96+
97+
### Implementation Support
98+
- Step-by-step guides for specific platforms
99+
- Troubleshooting common adoption challenges
100+
- Metrics and evaluation frameworks
101+
102+
## Questions and Support
103+
104+
### Before Contributing
105+
- Review the [FAQ](FAQ.md) for common questions
106+
- Read the [Rationale](RATIONALE.md) to understand design decisions
107+
- Check existing [issues](https://github.com/mistial-dev/BoundedContributionPolicy/issues) for ongoing discussions
108+
109+
### Getting Help
110+
For questions about contributing:
111+
- Open an issue with the "question" label
112+
- Focus on specific implementation or improvement topics
113+
- Provide context about your project type or use case
114+
115+
## Recognition
116+
117+
Contributors are recognized through:
118+
- Commit attribution in git history
119+
- Acknowledgment in release notes for significant improvements
120+
- Documentation of contributor suggestions that improve the policy
121+
122+
We appreciate contributions that help make technical collaboration more effective and focused.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)