Fix: add more logging and early client check for Linear integration

Co-authored-by: Junie <[email protected]>

Author: mashan555

src/github/junie/prepare-junie.ts

@@ -61,9 +61,11 @@ export async function initializeJunieExecution({
     // Start Linear issue if this is a Linear-triggered workflow
     if (isLinearWorkflowDispatchEvent(context)) {
         try {
+            console.log(`Starting Linear issue ${context.payload.issueId}...`);
             const client = getLinearClient();
             await client.addComment(context.payload.issueId, `🤖 Junie is starting work on this task (run ${context.runId})`);
             await client.startIssue(context.payload.issueId);
+            console.log(`✓ Initial comment posted and issue started in Linear for ${context.payload.issueId}`);
         } catch (linearError) {
             console.warn('Failed to start Linear issue or post initial comment:', linearError);
             // Don't fail the workflow if Linear update fails
@@ -110,6 +112,12 @@ async function shouldHandle(context: JunieExecutionContext, octokit: Octokits):
     console.log(`Checking if Junie should handle event: ${context.eventName}`);
     if (isLinearWorkflowDispatchEvent(context)) {
         console.log("✓ Linear workflow dispatch detected - handling task");
+        try {
+            getLinearClient(); // Just to verify token early
+        } catch (e) {
+            console.warn(`Linear client initialization failed: ${e instanceof Error ? e.message : String(e)}`);
+            // We don't return false here because we still want to try running the action
+        }
         return true;
     }